THE JOURNEYMAN 1977
THE JOURNEYWOMAN 1977
THE NUCLEAR FAMILY 1969
JUST SIX NUMBERS Martin Rees 1 OUR COSMIC HABITAT PLANETS STARS AND LIFE Page 24 A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence'
Flying Saucers and Science A Scientisis Investigates The MYSTERIES OF UFOs Stanton T. Friedman 2008 Chapter 5 The Cult of Seti Page 145 The Fermi Paradox "Two key scientists who were involved were Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch. They published a paper and shared information with Niels Bohr, the great Danish physicist. He brought the details to the United States. It was then determined that fission had actually taken place with the release of an amount of energy / Page 146 / indicating that the difference in the weight of the new atoms and the original uranium atom had been converted to energy by the famous E = mc2 equation. (E stands for energy, m for mass and c is the speed of light.) A key discovery was that the fission also produced more neutrons immediately indicating that a nuclear reaction was possible."
AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF A YOGI Paramahansa Yogananda 1946 "Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe." - John 4:48 Page 275 The Law of Miracles "Among the trillion mysteries of the cosmos the most phenomenal is light." "In the gigantic conceptions of Einstein the velocity of light - 186,300 miles per second dominate the whole Theory of Relativity."
" I am grateful to you for granting me some insight into this fascinating world. Thomas Mann"
ISISIS CHRISTOS THAT CHRISTOS ISISIS ISISIS CHRISTOS THAT CHRISTOS ISISIS
WISDOM OF THE EAST by Hari Prasad Shastri 1948 Page 8 "There is no such word in Sanscrita as 'Creation' applied to the universe. The Sanscrita word for Creation is Shristi, which means 'projection' Creation means to bring something into being out /Page 9/ of nothing, to create, as a novelist creates a character. There was no Miranda, for example, until Shakespeare created her. Similarly the ancient Indians (this term is innacurately used as there was no India at that time). who were our ancestors long, long ago. used a word for creation that means 'projection'
THE LOST LANGUAGE OF SYMBOLISM Harold Bayley 1912 Page 278 ""According to the authors of The Perfect Way, the words IS and ISH originally meant Light, and the name ISIS, once ISH-ISH, was Egyptian for Light-Light."
Page 278 "ONE-EYE, TWO-EYES, THREE-EYES" "According to the authors of The Perfect Way, the words IS and ISH originally meant Light, and the name ISIS, once ISH-ISH,
Daily Mail Monday, February 23,2009 ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS Compiled by Charles Legge Page 57
QUESTION Are the three stars that make up Orion's belt a similar distance from the Earth or do they just appear that way? ORION, the giant huntsman of Greek mythology whom Zeus placed among the stars as the constellation, has three stars of apparently similar brightness and colo (bluish-white) in his belt, given the Arabic names (from left to right) Alnitak, Alnilam and Mintaka. In fact, Alnitak is 800 light years away from us, Alnilam 1,300 light years and Mintaka 900 light years. Thy appear in a straight line only in our line of sight. Despite this, the three stars appear to be closely associated. Each is a luminous, hot `supergiant', haviing luminosities at least 100,000 times that of the Sun, and surface temperatures exceeding 25,000c (our Sun is 5,500c). The five billion years that our Sun has been around has meant that life has had time to develop on one of its planets — Earth. Norman Wallace, Sutton Coldfield, W. Mids.
Daily Mail Thursday, February 26,2009 Page 37 The eye of God! IT STARES down at us from the depths of space, watching our tiny world from 700 light years away. Scientists have nicknamed the image - captured by a giant telescope on the Chilean mountains - the eye of God.
Daily Mail Tuesday, April 14, 2009 Page 11 Hand of God Eye in the sky: The Helix nebula By Dan Newlin; (Image omitted) WE'VE already seen pictures of his eye ... now we have the first image of the hand of God.
Daily Mail Friday, February 27, 2009 Page 70 Case of Moore, not less QUESTION Former World Cup-winning footballer George Cohen says that in his playing days you were given an England cap only if you played for the full 90 minutes this was the case, how many times did Bobby Moore actual play for England? How much longer than David Beckham did he stay on the pitch? PLAYERS who represent England at senior level, whether they start a match or come on in the very last minute as a substitute, receive an international cap from the FA. Bobby Moore started every international match for which was selected and only once did he fail to complete the full 90 miniutes. He received a full cap for each of his 108 appearances. David Beckham, so far, has played in 108 full international for England. He has, however, acted as a substitute in nine of tlhose matches, making the starting lineup on only 99 occasions. But too, has a full allocation of caps in his locker (all 108). As of this month (following record-equalling appearances against Spain), the former Manchester United and Real Madrid star is on loan from LA Galaxy to Milan, had played just under 9000 minutes for his country. And remember, he has also been sent off twice in England games - against Argentina and Austria. Tony Matthews, football historian
Daily Mail Saturday, November 22, 2008 ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS Compiled by Charles Legge Page 107 QUESTION "Researching my family tree, I discovered one of my ancestors was named Mahala, a popular name in early 19th century. Was it FURTHER to the earlier answer, I am a carer looking after a lady called Mahala. She was born in the year 1909 will be 99 next month. She has always wondered where the name came from and was so pleased to find out from this column
that it probably came from Mrs Pat Skinner,
Daily Mail Saturday, December 13, 2008 SATURDAY ESSAY Extracted from The Fragmenting Family by Brenda Almond Page 18/19 WHO'LL DEFEND THE FAMILY Under attack; The traditional family unit provides the best upbringing for children (image omitted)" "This week UNICEF warned of the dangers to British children in driving mothers back to work. Here, a leading philosopher argues the liberal establishment's on the family is the most profoundly tragic mistakes of our age FROM almost the first moment of recorded history, one set of relationships has been at the heart of the human experience and the basis of civilisation itself: a mother and father who depend on each other; the children who rely on them both; a supportive network of grandarents, aunts, uncles and cousins. Without the loyalties and obligations of the committed family, our ancestors would certainly have struggled to survive in a dangerous and frightening world. How else but with the help of kin could they have coped with the critical moments in life: birth, sickness, old age, the need to educate and train their young? Without such help from the very beginning, it may be asked whether humankind would ever have developed the capacity to build an advanced civilisation. This week a report from Unicef, the UN's child welfare agency, warned that working mothers take a massive risk when they put their offspring into low quality childcare. Experts at the world body said such toddlers could suffer psychological harm and fare poorly later at school. Aggressive behaviour learned by children at some nurseries might contribute later to classroom disruption. The study for is the first major international report to warn of the dangers of the drive, pushed again by the Government this week, to get mothers back to work early. But the family has a. significance that goes way beyond the practicalities of day-to-day existence. From the very beginning, it has also given a special meaning to our human notions of past, present and future. Human beings could have regarded themselves as isolated individuals whose meaningless lives were snuffed out and forgotten after a brief span. Instead — a hugely important factor in driving social development — we have always tended to see ourselves as part of a great chain of existence, binding us to our forebears and to generations yet unborn. `To forget your ancestors is to be a brook without a source, a tree without a root,' says the old Chinese proverb. That undoubtedly reflects one of our deepest human instincts.
To modern ears, those words may sound some what romantic, or even a trifle overblown. But back in 1900, his view would have been shared by the overwhelming majority of MPs, lawyers, academics and the wider public. Until very recently, in fact, the importance of the family was taken for granted, not only as the basis of society, but as the foundation of our human identity. Today? In western societies — and especially in the English-speaking world — we think we know better. Forget the wisdom of the ages. Forget our deep- rooted instincts. Forget precepts that have governed every society in every era of history. The importance of the 'traditional' family is being challenged as never before. The idea has taken root that human families can be constructed in any way people want. The message is that biology counts for nothing. Biological mothers don't matter to their children. Biological fathers don't matter either. All that matters is what adults want — and children must adapt to it, whether they-like it or not. The sheer speed of what is happening is quite astonishing. In less than 50 years, the old values have been stood on their head. Today, legislators don't hesitate to plunge into 'reforms' that tear up the rights, duties and obligations that have underpinned the family for millennia. They rush into new 'post- modernist' concepts of family, partnering and parenthood. Indeed, they are even attempting to banish the word 'marriage' from the statute books. Everywhere in the West, the liberal consensus is on the march. In Britain, for example, a Labour Government has discouraged the use of the 'm' word in official documents, while in the U.S., the American Law Institute recommends that marriage should be `deprivileged' and not be given a status above any other relationship. Yet on any rational analysis, this reckless embrace of a brave new world is simply perverse, since there is no doubt whatever that the traditional family, underpinned by marriage, is the best way of bringing up secure, happy children and maintaining social stability. You don't have to be a religious believer or a Victorian moralist to take this view. The evidence speaks for itself (despite the strenuous efforts of the liberal establishment to ignore it). Fact: one in two unmarried couples splits up before their first child is five years old. The figure for married couples is just one in 12. Fact: children from broken homes are 75 per cent more likely than their classmates to fail at school, 70 per cent more likely to be involved with drugs and 50 per cent more likely to have alcohol problems. They are also more likely to run away from home, find themselves in the care system and end up in jail. At the very least, those bleak statistics should give us pause. The truth is that some of the most intractable problems facing Britain today — from our tragically high rate of teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases to petty crime, gang membership and welfare dependency — have their roots in family breakdown. That's not to say that all families are perfect. Sometimes, sadly, it can be for the best that a child is removed from its parents. Sometimes, it is for the best when couples separate. And it is certainly true that many, many children are brought up wonderfully in lone-parent households. All credit to the mothers — and sometimes fathers — who manage to do so. But that doesn't invalidate the general principle. By ignoring the real benefits that marriage brings to children and wider society our legislators are making profound error of judgment - perhaps the most serious mistake of the past half-century. So how have we come to this As I outline in my new book there are a whole range a complex reasons — not least the hatred of the family that some shallow-thinking but influentiaL intellectuals feel. They continue to promote the message that traditional family structures have no place in world of gender equality. OUR elected representatives have played their part, too, by demoting marriage as an institution, weakening its contractual aspects and promoting the dogma that 'family' is just legal and social convention. Take the shabby way successive governments have treater marriage in this country, even though they know perfectly well that it is one of the great foundations of society. It was a Tory Chancellor Kenneth Clarke, who dismissed the married couples' tax allowance as 'an anomaly'. And it was former Home Secretary Jack Straw who proclaimed 'This Government will not preach about marriage.' The result? In Britain today it just doesn't pay to get married Our tax and benefits system is so arranged that if lower-income / Page 19 / couples who are living together get married, they will significantly increase their tax payments and their their benefits. Perhaps it's no wonder that this country has a higher percentage of lone-parent families than any other country in Europe, apart from Sweden. The system is designed to create family instability. And the costs, both social and financial, are huge. How to explain this bizarre discouragement of an institution so important to the happiness, stability and financial health of the country? Politicians are terrified of being thought 'judgmental' about the way citizens live. And they obviously take the defeatist view that nothing can be done to improve matters anyway. Isn't it curious, then, that those same politicians feel no compunction at all about bossing us around to tell us to stop smoking, cut down our drinking and eat five portions of fruit a day? The same aversion to moralising applies increasingly to the laws on marriage and divorce. Not only are we witnessing ever easier divorce — whatever the children may need or want — and same-sex marriages, but there is also growing pressure to remove the words 'father' and 'mother' from birth certificates and replace them by 'Progenitor A' and 'Progenitor B' (as is already happening in Spain). Whatever the motivation behind such trends, the 'traditional' family structure is being badly eroded. All this reminds me of the grim ideas floated in ancient Athens 2,500 years ago. In the vision sketched out in Plato's Republic — a philosophical treatise on the most fundamental principles of the conduct of human society — mating would be random. Children would be raised by the state. Neither mothers nor fathers could claim their biological offspring as their own. Nor could they raise their children. In Plato's bleak prescription, men and women would join together briefly, then separate. Fathers had children by many mothers. Mothers bore children by different men. A disturbing scenario indeed. BUT isn't Plato's view now triumphant? In a few brief decades, the western world has so altered the traditional concept of Ideas which once seemed just a speculative nightmare now appear to be an emerging reality. And yet the family in its traditional form is crucial to us all — not simply because it underpins social stability or because it connects us to the past and the future, but because it's also a bulwark of freedom itself. Why? Because the invisible bonds it creates between its members generate loyalties and affections capable of resisting any tyranny. That's what, in the end, makes the family not just a conserving institution, but also the engine of liberty and progress. Yes, the family can sometimes fail. When it does, the consequences can be appalling. But at its best, it provides an anchor for individuals who would otherwise have no inspiration or support in an uncertain world. For these reasons we should think long and hard about where we are being taken by some of the fashionable dogmas of our day: the belief that divorce or separation doesn't hurt; that what adults do can't seriously harm their children; that cohabiting is at least as good as marrying; that genetic relationships don't matter; and that 'family' can mean whatever we want it to mean. All of these dogmas are false. All are deeply damaging. Every day we can see the consequences in broken families and broken lives.
I ME THE FAMILY 9 THE FAMILY FAMILY THE 9 FAMILY THE THE FAMILY FAMILY THE 2+8+5 6+1+4+9+3+7 6+1+4+9+3+7 2+8+5 THE FAMILY FAMILY THE THEFAMILY FAMILYTHE 2+8+5+ 6+1+4+9+3+7 6+1+4+9+3+7+ 2+8+5 THEFAMILY FAMILYTHE ATLMEFYHI IHYFEMLTA 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 ATLMEFYHI IHYFEMLTA THE FAMILY FAMILY THE THE LIGHT IS RISING RISING IS THE LIGHT THE FAMILY ATLMEFYHI IHYFEMLTA FAMILY THE THE FAMILY ATLMEFYHI 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 IHYFEMLTA FAMILY THE
Daily Mail Thursday, February 26, 2009 Page 34 ".........999........."
Daily Mail Tuesday, April 30, 2009 Page 33 ".........Called 999........." ".........dialled 999........." ".........called 999........."
Daily Mail Wednesday, March 4, 2009 By James Slack Home Affairs Editor Page 4 Don't phone 999, simply send police a text message! ".........call 999........."
Daily Mirror Friday, March 6, 2009 By Tom Pettifor Page 19 ".........dial 999........."
Daily Mail Thursday, April 30, 2009 ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS Compiled by Charles Legge Page 74 QUESTIONS Q: My son Major Matthew Bacon was killed by a roadside bomb in Basra in 2005, and my wife Maureen and I are supporters of They told how, on March 21 this year, while walking in the forest near their home, their dog found nine remembrance cards, each of which had the name of a soldier printed on it. One of those soldiers was our son. The nine cards had each been attached by red ribbon to nine white balloons which had all burst but were
together. Who sent the balloons? How did they get to Sweden?
How did so many of - them land in the same place? " nine remembrance cards" "The nine cards had each been attached by red ribbon to nine white balloons which had all burst but were together"
Daily Mail Thursday, April 30, 2009 Page 69 "......... WOW........."
Daily Mirror Friday, March 6, 2009 Page 19 "......... WOW........."
Daily Mirror Friday, March 6, 2009 By Martin Fricker Front Page "IS THIS IT? THIS IS IT!"
THE LIGHT IS RISING NOW RISING IS THE LIGHT
UNCONDITIONAL LIFE MASTERING THE FORCES THAT SHAPE PERSONAL REALITY Deepak Chopra 1991 A Mirage of Miracles Page 89 "The Mask of Maya" "...denoting the ability of gods to change form, to make worlds, to assume masks and disguises." "Maya also means magic a show of illusions" "Maya also denotes the delusion of thinking that you are seeing reality when in fact you are only seeing a layer of trick effects superimposed upon the real reality True to its deceptive nature, Maya is full of paradoxes. First of all it is everywhere, even though it doesnt exist. It is / Page 90 / often compared with a desert mirage, yet unlike a mirage Maya does not merely float "out there" The Mysterious One is nowhere if not in each person. Finally Maya is not so omnipotent that we cannot control it - and that is the key point Maya is fearfull or diverting all powerful or completely impotent depending on your perspective." "The fearfull illusion becomes a wonderful show if only you can manipulate it."
WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS
WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS
WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS
WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS
MAGI THE MAGIC SEE THE MAGI C THE MAGIC ART THOU MAGI THE MAGIC MAGI THE MAGIC THOUART
THE FIVES HAVE IT HAVE IT HAVE THE FIVES
I HAVE COME HAVE YOU COME FROM WHOLE SOURCE FROM WHOLE SOURCE HAVE I COME R U RECEIVING ME RECEIVING U LOUD AND CLEAR
GODISGODISGODISGODISGODISGODISGODISGODISGODISGOD
FLUX IS COOL COOL IS FLUX 6336 919 3663 3663 919 6336 18 19 18 18 19 18 9 1 9 9 1 9 18 19 18 18 19 18 6336 919 3663 3663 919 6336 FLUX IS COOL COOL IS FLUX
LETTERS TRANSPOSED INTO NUMBER REARRANGED IN NUMERICAL ORDER
FIRST CONTACT 1980
THE LIVING GODS ENERGIES GODS LIVING DIVINE THOUGHT THOUGHT DIVINE THE CREATORS R LIGHT PERFECT CREATORS I ME I ME I CREATORS PERFECT LIGHT R
GOD WITH US AND US WITH GOD
"The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel" (which means "God with us"). “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (which means, God with us). Matthew 1:23 "The virgin will conceive and give birth to a ... biblehub.com/matthew/1-23.htm
The Meaning of Immanuel, God with Us www.orlutheran.com/html/immanuel.html And this very special Christmas name, as Matthew tells us, means "God with us." Jesus Christ is Immanuel, "God with us," and I'd like to share why this is so ... Matthew 1:23 "The virgin will conceive and give birth to a ... matthew/1-23.
Christ Emmanuel or God with Us - Grace Gems! www.gracegems.org/W/e1.htm "They shall call His name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. ... give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel– which means, 'God with us.
Isaiah 7:14 Explained - Immanuel God With Us www.bibleanswerstand.org/immanuel.htm This study is aimed at finding the true meaning of Immanuel in Isaiah 7:14. ... texts for the deity of Jesus Christ because of the words, “Immanuel,” (God with us).
Why wasn't Jesus named Immanuel? - GotQuestions.org www.gotquestions.org/Immanuel-Jesus.html by S. Michael Houdmann - Jesus was God making His dwelling among us (John 1:1,14). No, Jesus' name was not Immanuel, but Jesus was the meaning of Immanuel, "God with us.
Words Around "Emmanuel" in the English Dictionary "The word Immanuel/Emmanuel means, "God with us." It conveys the idea of God come down in the flesh, mingling alongside mankind, subject to their brutality, while extending his love in bringing their redemption."
GOD WITH US AND US WITH GOD
GOD WITH US 123456789 987654321 US WITH GOD
HALLELUJAH HURRAH FOR RAH FOR RAH HURRAH HALLELUJAH
JUST SIX NUMBERS Martin Rees 1 OUR COSMIC HABITAT I PLANETS STARS AND LIFE Page 24 "A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence' "
"A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence'"
WHY SMASH ATOMS A. K. Solomon 1940 VAN DE GRAAFF GENERATOR Page 77 "Once the fairy tale hero has penetrated the ring of fire round the magic mountain he is free to woo the heroine in her castle on the mountain top."
OF TIME AND STARS Arthur C. Clarke 1972 FOREWORD "'Into the Comet' and 'The Nine Billion Names of God' both involve computers and the troubles they may cause us. While writing this preface, I had occasion to call upon my own HP 9100A computer, Hal Junior, to answer an interesting question. Looking at my records, I find that I have now written just about one hundred short stories. This volume contains eighteen of them: therefore, how many possible 18-story collections will I be able to put together? The answer as I am sure will be instantly obvious to you - is 100 x 99. . . x 84 x 83 divided by 18 x 17 x 16 ... x .2 x 1. This is an impressive number - Hal Junior tells me that it is approximately 20,772,733,124,605,000,000. Page 15 The Nine Billion Names of God 'This is a slightly unusual request,' said Dr Wagner, with what he hoped was commendable restraint. 'As far as I know, it's the first time anyone's been asked to supply a Tibetan monastery with an Automatic Sequence Computer. I don't wish to be inquisitive, but I should hardly have thought that your - ah - establishment had much use for such a machine. Could you explain just what you intend to do with it?' Page16 'We have reason to believe,' continued the lama imperturbably, 'that all such names can be written with not more than nine letters in an alphabet we have devised.'
I = 9 9 = I R = 9 9 = R
OF T9ME AND STA9S A9thu9 C. Cla9ke,1972 Page 15 'Th9s 9s a sl9ghtly unusual 9equest,'sa9d D9 Wagne9, w9th what he hoped was commendable 9est9a9nt.' As fa9 as 9 know, 9t's the f99st t9me anyone's been asked to supply a T9betan monaste9y with an Automat9c Sequence Compute9. 9 don't w9sh to be 9nqu9s9t9ve, but 9 should ha9dly have thought that you9- ah - establ9shment had much use for such a mach9ne.Could you expla9n just what you 9ntend to do w9th 9t?' 'Gladly,' 9epl9ed the lama, 9eadjust9ng h9s s9lk 9obes and ca9efully putting away the sl9de 9ule he had been us9ng fo9 cu99ency conve9s9ons. 'You9 Ma9k V Compute9 can ca99y out any 9out9ne mathemat9cal ope9at9on 9nvolv9ng up to ten d9g9ts. Howeve9, for ou9 work we are 9nte9ested 9n lette9s, not numbe9s. As we w9sh you to mod9fy the output c9rcu9ts,the mach9ne w9ll be p99nt9ng wo9ds not columns of f9gu9es.' '9 dont qu9te unde9stand…' 'Th9s 9s a p9oject on wh9ch we have been work9ng fo9 the last th9ee centu99es - s9nce the lamase9y was founded, 9n fact.9t 9s somewhat al9en to you9 way of thought, so9 hope you w9ll l9sten with an open m9nd wh9le 9 expla9n 9t 'Natu9ally.' '9t 9s 9eally qu9te s9mple.We have been comp9l9ng a l9st wh9ch shall conta9n all the poss9ble names of God' '9 beg you9 pa9don?' / Page16 / 'We have 9eason to bel9eve' cont9nued the lama 9mpe9tu9bably, ' that all such names can be w99tten with not mo9e than n9ne lette9s 9n an alphabet we have dev9sed,' 'And you have been do9ng th9s for three centu99es? 'Yes: we expected9t would take us about f9fteen thousand years to complete the task.' 'Oh, Dr Wagne9 looked a l9ttle dazed. 'Now9 see why you wanted to h99e one of ou9 mach9nes. But what exactly9s the pu9pose of th9s p9oject ? 'The lama hes9tated fo9 a f9act9on of a second, and Wagne9 wonde9ed9f he had offended h9m.9f so the9e was no t9ace of annoyance9n the 9eply. 'Call9t 99tual, 9f you l9ke, but 9t's a fundamental pa9t of ou9 bel9ef. All the many names of the Sup9eme Be9ng - God , Jehova , Allah , and so on - they a9e only man made labels. The9e 9s a ph9losoph9cal p9oblem of some d9ff9culty he9e, wh9ch9 do not p9opose to d9scuss, but somewhe9e among all the poss9ble comb9nat9ons of lette9s that can occu9 a9e what one may call the 9eal names of God. By systemat9c pe9mutat9on of lette9s, we have been t9y9ng to l9st them all' 9 see. You've been sta9t9ng at AAAAAAA… and wo9k-9ng up to ZZZZZZZZ …' 'Exactly - though we use a spec9al alphabet of ou9 own. Mod9fy9ng the elect9omat9c typew99te9s to deal w9th th9s 9s of cou9se t99v9al. A 9athe9 mo9e 9nte9est9ng p9oblem 9s that of dev9s9ng su9table c99cu9ts to el9m9nate 9 9d9culous comb9nat9ons. Fo9 example, no lette9 must occu9 mo9e than th9ee t9mes 9n sucess9on.' 'Th9ee? Su9ely you mean two.' 'Th9ee 9s co99ect; 9 am af9a9d 9t would take too long to expla9n why , even 9f you unde9stood ou9 language.'/ Page 17 / '9'm su9e 9t would,' sa9d Wagne9 hast9ly. 'Go on.' 'Luck9ly, 9t w9ll be a s9mple matte9 to adapt you9 Automat9c Sequence Compute9 fo9 th9s wo9k, s9nce once 9t has been p9og9ammed p9ope9ly 9t w9ll pe9mute each lette9 9n tu9n and p99nt the 9esult. What would have taken us f9fteen thousand years 9t w9ll be able to do 9n a hund9ed days.' 'Dr Wagne9 was sca9cely consc9ous of the fa9nt sounds f9om the Manhatten st9eets fa9 below. He was 9n a d9ffe9ent wo9ld, a wo9ld of natu9al, not man-made mounta9ns. H9gh up 9n the99 9emote ae99es these monks had been pat9ently at wo9k gene9at9on afte9 gene9at9on, comp9l9ng the99 l9sts of mean9ngless wo9ds. Was the9e any l9m9ts to the foll9es of mank9nd ? St9ll, he must g9ve no h9nt of h9s 9nne9 thoughts. The custome9 was always 99ght…"
OF TIME AND STARS Arthur C. Clarke 1972 Page 68 Into the Comet
DECIPHER MANKIND HAD 1200 YEARS YEARS TO CRACK THE CODE WE HAVE ONE WEEK LEFT Stel Pavlou Page 357 24 hours "We live in a universe of patterns. Every night the stars move in circles across the sky. The seasons cycle at yearly inter vals. No two snowflakes are ever exactly the same, but the all have sixfold symmetry. Tigers and zebras are covered in patterns of stripes; leopards and hyenas are covered in pat terns of spots. Intricate trains of waves march across the oceans; very similar trains of sand dunes march across the desert . . . By using mathematics... we have discovered great secret: nature's patterns are not just there to be admired, they are vital clues to the rules that govern natural processes." Ian Stewart, Nature's Numbers, 1995
2061 ODYSSEY THREE Arthur C. Clarke 1987 Page 13 (number 0mitted) "THE MAGIC MOUNTAIN"
THE LOST WORLDS OF 2001 Arthur C.Clarke 1972 "Sorry to interrupt the festivities, but we have a problem."
Zarathustra theme to his TV audience, aboard Apollo 13 Command Module Odyssey)
THE MAGIC MOUNTAIN Thomas Mann 1924 Page 706 /716 (inclusive) THE THUNDERBOLT Page 716 "FINIS OPERIS"
THE DIE IS NOW CAST NOW CAST IS THE DIE
CITIZENS OF PLANET EARTH WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT THAT ALL HUMAN BEINGS ARE CREATED EQUAL THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS
GODS PEACE BE UNTO YOU CHILDREN OF THE RAINBOW LIGHT SALUTATIONS AND GOODWILL THOUGHTS OF LIGHT AND LOVE GODS LOVE AND LIGHT UPON YOU AND UPON ALL SENTIENT BEINGS
......
......
......
GODDESS OF GOODNESS IS O IS GOODNESS OF GODDESS
......
GOD ONE GOD AND ONE CHOSEN RACE THE HUMAN RACE
HOLY BIBLE Scofield References C 1 V 16 THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLESPage 1148 (Part quoted) "MEN AND BRETHREN THIS SCRIPTURE MUST NEEDS HAVE BEEN FULFILLED WHICH THE HOLY GHOST BY THE MOUTH OF DAVID SPAKE"
SECRETS OF THE PYRAMIDS REVEALED Robert K. Moffett 1976 Page 153 "Maat can be defined loosely as Truth (definately capitalized) or "right order" "Maat" "Maat" Page 154 "In the pursuit of Maat,"
9 I AM AT MAAT AM AT MAAT MAAT AM AT MAAT ISISIS ISISIS MAAT ISISIS IS GODS LAW GODS IS I AM AT TA MA AM MAAT AT AM I 9
I ME REAL REALITY REAL LAW IS MAAT IS MAAT IS LAW THAT ISISIS THE CREATORS R PERFECT R CREATORS BALANCING ALWAYS BALANCING I AM MAAT AT AM AT MAAT AM I R DIVINE CREATORS R CREATORS DIVINE R
HOW GREAT THOU ART MY GOD HOW GREAT THOU ART
|